About Turkey
Why Turkey known as the sick man of the Europe
First of all, Turkey was NEVER called the “sick man of Europe”. That term was used for the Ottoman Empire. Turkey and the Ottoman Empire are two different things. That would be like saying Italy and the Roman Empire are somehow the same when they are not. The UK and the British Empire are two very different things. You should have written “Why did the Ottoman Empire become known as the “sick man of Europe” ?” because Turkey didn’t exist as a Republic until the 20th century.
Well, some Turks might consider it to be an insulting term, but it’s not an insulting term. The Ottoman Empire was one of the most powerful empires when it emerged on the European scene around 1453. If you compare the Ottoman Empire of 1453 to the one of 1853, then you see that the Ottoman Empire of 1453 was like someone with a strong body and healthy, and the Ottoman Empire of 1853 was like someone with a weak body. It happens to empires.
When it comes to technology, weapons, science, and the arts,
the Europeans were moving away from the dark ages and after the Renaissance
started becoming quite powerful. You also by the 1500s had European powers that
were emerging like France, Prussia, Britain, and Russia. By the 1700’s, the
Ottomans were a lot weaker than they were before. The Russians who were once on
the defensive began pushing very hard and taking a lot of territory the
Ottomans controlled like the Crimea. The Russian encroachment led Circassian
and Chechen Muslims to flee from the Caucuses to Turkey, Syria, Lebanon,
Jordan, and Egypt, and many Circassians state that they suffered a mass
genocide and lost hundreds of thousands of their people (they had a small
population and still do).
At any rate, we are no longer in the age of empires, and all
empires decline. That is why we don’t have something called the Roman Empire
anymore. Under Mussolini, people were being told about the old glories of the
Roman Empire, and Mussolini was using that to inspire Italians, and you see
that same behavior in Turkey with neo-Ottomanism, but what’s key for Turkey or
Britain is not old empires they used to have, but how advanced they are as
countries in the modern era.
In a nutshell, the Ottoman Empire was once robust, healthy
empire in terms of its power and technology. The British wouldn’t have referred
to the Ottomans that was in 1650, but by 1850, in comparison to the Ottoman
Empire of 1650, the empire appeared sick as it had lost lots of territory in
North Africa and in Eurasia and the Caucus Mountains. It was somewhat on the
retreat.
good
ReplyDelete